Tanggung Jawab Peer Reviewer Peer reviewer bertanggung jawab untuk mengkritisi dengan membaca dan mengevaluasi naskah dalam bidang keahliannya, kemudian memberikan saran yang membangun dan umpan balik yang jujur kepada penulis artikel yang disampaikan. Peer reviewer, diskusikan kekuatan dan kelemahan artikel, bagaimana meningkatkan kekuatan dan kualitas makalah, dan mengevaluasi relevansi dan keaslian naskah. Sebelum meninjau, harap perhatikan hal-hal berikut:
• Apakah artikel yang diminta untuk direview sesuai dengan keahlian Anda? Jika Anda menerima skrip yang mencakup topik yang tidak sesuai dengan bidang keahlian Anda, harap beri tahu editor sesegera mungkin. Harap rekomendasikan pengulas alternatif.
• Do you have the time to review this paper? The review process must be completed within two months. If you agree and require a longer period, notify the editor as soon as possible, or suggest an alternative reviewer.
• Is there any potential conflict of interest? Meanwhile, conflicts of interest will not disqualify you as a reviewer, disclose all conflicts of interest to the editor before reviewing. If you have any questions about potential conflicts of interest, do not hesitate to contact the editorial office. Review Process When reviewing the article, please consider the following:
• Title: is it clearly illustrating the article?
• Abstract: does it reflect the contents of the article?
• Introduction: does it describe the accuracy of matters submitted by the author and clearly state the problem being considered? Typically, the introduction should summarize the context of the relevant research, and explain the findings of the research or other findings, if any, offered for discussion.
This research should explain the experiments, hypotheses, and methods. Content of the Article In order to determine the originality and suitability for the journal, are there any elements of plagiarism over 25% of this paper field? A quick literature search can use certain tools such as Scopus to see if there are similarities from other parts. if the study had been previously done by other authors, it is still eligible for publication? is the article is fairly new, fairly deep, and interesting to be published? does it contribute to knowledge? does the article adhere to the standards of the journal? Scope - Is the article in line with the objectives and scope of the journal? Method Comprehensive and perfect:
• does the author accurately describe how the data is collected?
• is the theoretical basis or reference used appropriately for this study?
• is the exposure design suitable for the answer to the question?
• is there decent enough information for you to imitate the research?
• does the article identify the following procedures?
• are there any new methods? If there is a new method, does the author explain it in detail?
• is there any appropriate sampling?
• have the tools and materials used been adequately explained? and does the article exposure describe what type of data is recorded; right in describing the measurement? Results:
This is where the author must explain the findings of his/her research. It should be clearly laid out and in a logical sequence. You will need to consider whether the appropriate analysis has been carried out; the use of statistical tools? If you have better statistical tools to be used in this study, notify it, and the interpretation need not be included in this section. Discussion and Conclusion:
• are the claims in this section is supported by fair results and quite reasonable?
• does the author compare the research results with other previous ones?
• do the results of research written in the article contradict the previous theories?
• does the conclusion explain how better scientific research is to be followed up? Tables and Pictures: Is it suitable with the referred explanation by showing data that is easy to interpret and understandable for the readers? Writing Styles
• Authors must be critical of most of the literature and systematic review of the issues, which is relevant to the field of study
• Reviews should be focused on a single topic • All exposure should be in English and written in a good and coherent grammar
• Easy to understand
• Interesting to read. Things that need to be considered:
• Perspective. A unique perspective that describes experiences and situations related to issues in marketing management, finance management, strategic management, operation management, human resource management, e-business, knowledge management, management accounting, management control system, management information system, international business, business economics, business ethics and sustainable, and entrepreneurship. Originality Research.
• The original data and testing. It must present data that offers a new approach to improve systems, processes, and precision of the tools which are used.
• Research policy and observational analysis. It should clarify the feasibility, effectiveness, and implementation of the research results. It is not limited to the topic of marketing management, finance management, strategic management, operation management, human resource management, e-business, knowledge management, management accounting, management control system, management information system, international business, business economics, business ethics, sustainable, and entrepreneurship.
• In Practice (case study). The paper should explain the situation regarding the future challenges in marketing management, finance management, strategic management, operation management, human resource management, e-business, knowledge management, management accounting, management control system, management information system, international business, business economics, business ethics and sustainable, and entrepreneurship, within its conclusions, and things which can be learned.
• Reference.
• First Person (Interview);
• Book Reviews;
• Insight Technology (Product Review) Final Review • All results of the review submitted by reviewers are confidential
• If you want to discuss the article with a colleague, kindly inform the editor
• Do not contact the author directly.
• Ethical issues:
- Plagiarisme: Jika Anda mencurigai artikel tersebut sebagian besar merupakan plagiarisme dari penulis lain, beri tahu editor untuk mengetahui detailnya
- Penipuan: Sangat sulit untuk mendeteksi kategori penipuan, tetapi jika Anda mencurigai hasil dalam artikel tersebut tidak benar, mohon informasikan kepada redaksi Selesaikan "The Review" sebelum tanggal jatuh tempo ke kantor redaksi.
Rekomendasi Anda untuk artikel tersebut akan dipertimbangkan ketika editor membuat keputusan akhir dan umpan balik jujur Anda sangat dihargai. Saat menulis komentar, tunjukkan bagian komentar yang hanya ditujukan untuk editor dan bagian yang dapat dikembalikan ke penulis. Harap jangan ragu untuk menghubungi kantor redaksi jika ada pertanyaan atau masalah yang mungkin Anda temui.
Call for articles Submission Template Reviewer Proses Peer Reviewer Editorial team Focus and Scope Author Fee charges Guidelines writer Guide review Screening Plagiarism Indexing Contact Us Policy Open Access Ethics publication History of the Journal Indexed by:
